Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance https://shoppotinsurance.com Cannabis and Marijuana Insurance Quotes Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:34:10 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.2.3 https://i2.wp.com/shoppotinsurance.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/cropped-Free-Pixabay-Download-Pot-Leaf.png?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance https://shoppotinsurance.com 32 32 Cannabis and Marijuana Insurance Quotes Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance clean Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance greenpointinsurance@gmail.com greenpointinsurance@gmail.com (Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance) Cannabis and Marijuana Insurance Quotes Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance https://shoppotinsurance.com/wp-content/plugins/powerpress/rss_default.jpg https://shoppotinsurance.com 140339022 Prices for Product Liability just Increased Vitamin E Acetate Removed from Coverage https://shoppotinsurance.com/prices-for-product-liability-just-increased-vitamin-e-acetate-removed-from-coverage/ https://shoppotinsurance.com/prices-for-product-liability-just-increased-vitamin-e-acetate-removed-from-coverage/#respond Fri, 27 Sep 2019 23:52:53 +0000 https://shoppotinsurance.com/?p=3025 The post Prices for Product Liability just Increased Vitamin E Acetate Removed from Coverage appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>

Cannabis Licensees will pay more for insurance due to dangerous and deadly vaping-related respiratory illnesses

 

  • Cannabis licensees will pay more for product liability insurance

  • Vitamin E Acetate is being added to a growing list of ingredients insurance companies don’t want to cover

  • Cannabis licensee removes vaporizing devices off their shelf

The latest bad news with vaporizing devices causing death and lung illness did not take the insurance industry much time to start raising their prices for product liability insurance.  

One of our insurance carriers increased the price by 15% for a cannabis manufacturing company.  The increase in premium will also mean underwriting by insurance companies is about to become even more cumbersome.

Insurance carrier removes coverage for vitamin e acetate

No insurance coverage for Vitamin E Molecule

Even more interesting, the insurance carrier has added vitamin e acetate to the list of ingredients now being excluded or not covered if a claim or lawsuit was to be filed.   This ingredient has been identified by the New York State Department of Health as being linked to those individuals experiencing illness.   

A recent product recall by Medicine Man identified vitamin e acetate as a ingredient they did not want their customers consuming.

Vitamin E Exclusion

Vitamin E Acetate Product Liability Coverage Removal

 

 

The post Prices for Product Liability just Increased Vitamin E Acetate Removed from Coverage appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>
https://shoppotinsurance.com/prices-for-product-liability-just-increased-vitamin-e-acetate-removed-from-coverage/feed/ 0 3025
Voluntary Product Recall for Vape Pens by Colorado Cannabis Licensee https://shoppotinsurance.com/voluntary-product-recall-for-vape-pens-by-colorado-cannabis-licensee/ https://shoppotinsurance.com/voluntary-product-recall-for-vape-pens-by-colorado-cannabis-licensee/#respond Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:43:52 +0000 https://shoppotinsurance.com/?p=2998 The post Voluntary Product Recall for Vape Pens by Colorado Cannabis Licensee appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>

Medicine Man Pulls Vape Products with Propylene Glycol or Vitamin E Acetate Off Shelves

 

  • Colorado based Medicine Man issues press release removing vape pens off their shelf if ingredients include propylene glycol or vitamin E acetate
  • Voluntary recalls might be a covered loss on certain product liability insurance policies.
  • Recalling a product will not typically jeopardize the indemnification provision in most product liability policies.   

In a press release, Colorado based cannabis licensee Medicine Man is removing all vape products containing the ingredients propylene glycol or vitamin E acetate.  Vitamin E acetate has been identified by the New York State Department of Health as being linked in their investigation with victims suffering health consequences. 

Product recall covered by insurance?

From a insurance and risk perspective, Medicine Man is taking the prudent step to reduce their potential liability exposure by removing product for sale, if indeed these ingredients are linked to the national health risks associated with vaping.

A “product recall” is typically defined in most product liability insurance policies.  This definition will help determine the type of recall being performed and how the policy may respond.  For example, some policies define product recall based on notification from an authorized government entity versus a voluntary recall.

Depending on the cannabis product liability insurance company, the costs covered for a recall may include notification, transportation, and disposal of product depending on the policy wording.

Does a product recall jeopardize my liability protection?

Not typically.  A product recall demonstrates being proactive and reducing liability for the licensee and insurance company.  Most reasonable insurance companies will view these actions as mitigating your risk exposure.     

If it is determined vitamin e acetate is responsible for the health problems, then cannabis licensees should begin analyzing the many risk factors such as any potential legal basis of the claim or lawsuit, types of damages, other  parties involved, and how their insurance carrier might respond based on the policy wording.

       

 

The post Voluntary Product Recall for Vape Pens by Colorado Cannabis Licensee appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>
https://shoppotinsurance.com/voluntary-product-recall-for-vape-pens-by-colorado-cannabis-licensee/feed/ 0 2998
Deaths and Respiratory Issues from Vaping Devices will cause Insurance Carriers to Contemplate Product Liability Coverage https://shoppotinsurance.com/deaths-and-respiratory-issues-from-vaping-ecigarettes-will-cause-insurance-carriers-to-contemplate-product-liability-coverage/ https://shoppotinsurance.com/deaths-and-respiratory-issues-from-vaping-ecigarettes-will-cause-insurance-carriers-to-contemplate-product-liability-coverage/#respond Tue, 10 Sep 2019 21:40:36 +0000 https://shoppotinsurance.com/?p=2954 The post Deaths and Respiratory Issues from Vaping Devices will cause Insurance Carriers to Contemplate Product Liability Coverage appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>

Could the Use of Cannabis Vaping Devices be the Next Wave of Insurance Claims?

Today, the California’s Cannabis Industry Association (CCIA) issued a statement responding to recent respiratory issues caused by vaping devices.  There have been 60 reported cases in California, but no cases have been associated with products purchased from California cannabis licensees.  There has been one death in California according to SF Gate

The CCIA may be responding to a recent death that occurred in Oregon connected to a cannabis device purchased from an Oregon cannabis licensee.  The Oregon Health Authority issued a statement on September 3, 2019 indicating the following:

Investigators at the OHA Public Health Division say they received reports that the individual, who died in July, had recently used an e-cigarette or vaping device containing cannabis purchased from a cannabis dispensary.

This investigation is ongoing, but may be the first death linked to a cannabis vaping device purchased from a licensee in the history of the United States. 

Black Market THC devices

Source: New York Department of Health

The State of New York has also insured a warning to the public.  Their focus is on unregulated cannabis devices bought in New York illegally with preliminary indications of high levels of vitamin E acetate.

Laboratory test results showed very high levels of vitamin E acetate in nearly all cannabis-containing samples analyzed by the Wadsworth Center as part of this investigation. At least one vitamin E acetate containing vape product has been linked to each patient who submitted a product for testing. Vitamin E acetate is not an approved additive for New York State Medical Marijuana Program-authorized vape products and was not seen in the
nicotine-based products that were tested.

The State of New York has provided product images from black market devices that can be viewed here.

Expect Product Liability Insurance Carriers to Take Immediate Action through Policy Modifications

The cannabis insurance industry will likely evaluate the potential impact of these events on products being offered and bought by licensees.  At this stage it would appear vitamin E acetate has been isolated with illegal cannabis vaping devices. If the product purchased in Oregon has the same ingredient, then insurance carriers might not react as quickly.   

The type of insurance most likely to pay for claims and lawsuits is product liability coverage.  These policies were designed to provide liability protection for cannabis products like vaping devices when they enter the stream of commerce and consumed by a third party.  

If a respiratory illness or death was to occur using a cannabis vaping device, then insurance of this nature will respond to any claims or lawsuits that could arise.  These policies offer starting limits of $1,000,000 with legal defense included for bodily injury damages.  The respiratory illness or death would fall under the category of bodily injury as defined by the policy terms.  

The Oregon death related to a cannabis vaping device could trigger the few product liability carriers to immediately modify their policy terms through an exclusion to eliminate this threat or cause certain insurance carriers to exit the industry.  That exclusion may be a simple removal of vitamin E acetate also known as alpha-Tocopherol acetate or Tocopherol acetate to an outright ban on any type of vaping device.

Cannabis licensees should review their product liability insurance coverage

Determine if you have product liability insurance.  Most commercial general liability policies will remove the coverage.  The insurance term to indicate coverage is typically “Products & Completed Operations.”

If you have product liability insurance review if vape pens or vaporizing devices are excluded on your policy or included on your list of products to be covered.  This modification is most likely to show up as a separate page and might require a review from your attorney. 

A recent blog article comparing product liability insurance carriers graphically indicated four insurance companies are covering vaporizing devices. 

Below is an example from a policy indicating devices used for vaping must be covered 

Vaporing devices product liability included

Vaporizing devices has been included on the list of products being sold by this licensee

 

Vaporizing Devices Exclusion

Specific policy exclusion for vaporizing devices

 

CCIA Statement on Vape Pen Illness

Letter-to-Legislature-re_-vape-products

Oregon Public Health Statement

Oregon DPH Cannabis Vaping

New York Department of Health

NY Public Health Statement Vaping Vitamin E Warning

The post Deaths and Respiratory Issues from Vaping Devices will cause Insurance Carriers to Contemplate Product Liability Coverage appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>
https://shoppotinsurance.com/deaths-and-respiratory-issues-from-vaping-ecigarettes-will-cause-insurance-carriers-to-contemplate-product-liability-coverage/feed/ 0 2954
Cannabis Product Liability Policy Comparison Includes Coverage for RICO, MOLD, and Asbestos https://shoppotinsurance.com/cannabis-product-liability-policy-comparison/ https://shoppotinsurance.com/cannabis-product-liability-policy-comparison/#respond Fri, 30 Aug 2019 20:57:37 +0000 https://shoppotinsurance.com/?p=2932 The post Cannabis Product Liability Policy Comparison Includes Coverage for RICO, MOLD, and Asbestos appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>
Cannabis Product Liability Comparison

Source Stephen Jones Twitter @CannabisBroker1

Cannabis Product Liability Policy Comparison Includes and Excludes Significant Coverage Issues

A tweet posted by a California insurance broker (Stephen Jones@CannabisBroker1) caught our attention due the level of detail being advertised from a Product Liability Policy Comparison.  The graphic provides specific contrast of possible product liability coverage due to a specific cause from six different cannabis insurance companies. 

The product liability policy comparison included insurance companies Continental Heritage, CannGen, Golden Bear, James River, Kinsale, and Conifer.  With the exception of Continental Heritage, we are aware of the remaining insurance companies offering product liability insurance to the cannabis industry. 

One Insurance Carrier Breaks Away from the Pack

Continental Heritage appears from the graphic to include coverage for claims related to Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), Mold, Fungi, Bacteria, Asbestos, Silica, and Lead.  Furthermore, Continental Heritage includes coverage for Mental Illness, Cancer, Birth Defects, Heart Disease, Communicable Disease, Respiratory Disease, and Cannabis Intoxication.


DISCLAIMER:  PLEASE HAVE A LICENSED ATTORNEY REVIEW THE INSURANCE CONTRACTS BEFORE PROCUREMENT TO VALIDATE THE RELIANCE OF THE REPRESENTATIONS BEING MADE.  PLEASE VISIT OUR TERMS OF USE.

The post Cannabis Product Liability Policy Comparison Includes Coverage for RICO, MOLD, and Asbestos appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>
https://shoppotinsurance.com/cannabis-product-liability-policy-comparison/feed/ 0 2932
Outdoor Cannabis and CBD Crop Insurance Becomes Available https://shoppotinsurance.com/outdoor-cannabis-and-cbd-crop-insurance-becomes-available/ https://shoppotinsurance.com/outdoor-cannabis-and-cbd-crop-insurance-becomes-available/#respond Thu, 30 May 2019 23:18:15 +0000 https://shoppotinsurance.com/?p=2833 The post Outdoor Cannabis and CBD Crop Insurance Becomes Available appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>

Insurance Company Offering Protection for Outdoor Plants

In the history of cannabis insurance there has never been a insurance company willing to offer coverage for cannabis plants growing outside.  Think about it, the chances of something going wrong due to weather or criminals seeking an easy target had scared off most insurance companies.  Indoor crop insurance has been available from approximately two companies knowing those plants are protected by four walls, video, alarms, and gated windows. 

However, the thought of offering outdoor crop insurance was unheard of until now. 

The insurance industry is conservative my nature.  The availability of outdoor crop insurance is considered a giant leap forward for both the cannabis and insurance industry.  There are many variables analyzed by actuaries attempting to quantify if a program of this nature will be viable long term.   Those variables include understanding the numerous hail storms that occur in Colorado.  That California is subjected to many wild fires.  Washington State can experience flooding and wind damage.  Knowing an insurance company analyzed these types of risk was the last frontier in cannabis insurance to be conquered. 

SecurityOf course, there are coverage limitations meaning how much the insurance carrier is willing to cover along with underwriting requirements particularly focused on the security of those living plants, water availability to combat a fire, and brush clearance surrounding the property.   These are reasonable expectations every outdoor cannabis farmer should be incorporating even if insurance wasn’t involved.

The coverage limits offered by the insurance company are more generous on cannabis (THC) as opposed to Hemp (CBD).  The reason seems to point toward the lack of regulations within CBD industry.  The types of covered losses such as fire, theft, and hail should be carefully reviewed along with specific exclusions with a licensed insurance broker specializing in the industry.      

How will the insurance carrier determine the value of my outdoor plants?

The application has a designated area to determine values based on the stage of the plant.  These stages such as seedlings, vegetative, flowering, and harvested can be insured in “layers” of coverage amounts. 

For example,  the number of flowering plants multiplied by the wholesale value will equal total plant value.  If a cannabis grower had 1,000 flowering plants valued at wholesale at $500 per plant, then the insurance coverage amount would be $500,000.  The value of seedlings is less than the value of harvested plant material. 

Knowing the wholesale value of those plants will fluctuate, it will be important for the cannabis grower to be certain their limits will sufficiently protect them from a loss. 

Need a quote for your outdoor crop insurance?

Outdoor crop insurance is now available!  For more information, please complete this online inquiry if you have interest in obtaining further information. 

 

 

 

Disclaimer:  We are not licensed in all states.  Please visit our terms of use page. The images do not represent a covered cause of loss.   

 

 

The post Outdoor Cannabis and CBD Crop Insurance Becomes Available appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>
https://shoppotinsurance.com/outdoor-cannabis-and-cbd-crop-insurance-becomes-available/feed/ 0 2833
Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome Illness Leaves Industry Wondering about Insurance Protection https://shoppotinsurance.com/cannabinoid-hyperemesis-syndrome-illness-leaves-industry-wondering-about-insurance-protection/ https://shoppotinsurance.com/cannabinoid-hyperemesis-syndrome-illness-leaves-industry-wondering-about-insurance-protection/#respond Fri, 05 Apr 2019 17:36:16 +0000 https://shoppotinsurance.com/?p=2772 The post Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome Illness Leaves Industry Wondering about Insurance Protection appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>

Cannabis Customers Experience Abdominal Pain and Vomitting

We investigate the world of insurance to determine if product liability insurance would protect cannabis stores, growers, and manufacturers from Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome (“CHS”).   In case you’re unfamiliar with CHS, it apparently affects certain cannabis users causing nausea, repeated vomiting, abdominal pain, decreased appetite, and fluid loss. 

The people effected by this illness can end up in the hospital emergency room due to the vomiting.  Does not sound like a fun illness to have especially if the person ends up with medical bills, out of work, and in rare cases seizures have apparently been reported.

Cannabis companies question if they have a potential liability 

We don’t have access to every insurance company offering product liability protection to the cannabis industry.  That is our disclaimer.  Therefore, we limit our review to insurance carriers typically represented by our office for these types of transactions. 

If you’re a cannabis licensee, the first task is to look at your current insurance policies to determine if you even have product liability. 

Why is this important? 

The insurance companies rely heavily on the policies they’ve produced when determining if a claim is covered.  The adjusters in the majority of cannabis insurance claims will review the wording in the policy language to determine if coverage is available or not.      

Most cannabis business insurance policies will exclude or remove coverage for “Products and Completed Operations.”  If you see this term excluded, then it means you have no coverage on that policy.   It might be prudent to determine if other policies exists because it may have been purchased separately.

 

Product Liability Exclusions on a PolicyThe insuring agreement is standard in every insurance policy.  Its the insurance carrier’s acknowledgement of their agreement with an insured.  In this example, the insurance carriers are using standardized industry forms or policy language:  

 

 

1. Insuring Agreement
a. We will pay those sums that the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages because of “bodily injury” or “property damage” included within the “products-completed operations hazard” to which this insurance applies.

The insured is the cannabis store, grower, or manufacturing company. 

The bodily injury in quotes means it has been defined or a specific definition exists within the policy.  For example:

2. “Bodily injury” means bodily injury, sickness or disease sustained by a person, including death resulting from any of these at any time.

It would be difficult for an insurance carrier to argue CHS is not a sickness.

Lastly we reviewed if the insurance policy excludes or removes coverage for CHS.  The word exclusion is a commonly used insurance industry term.  Many insurance claims are denied because of exclusions meaning no coverage.  Insurance companies will commonly specify their intention to exclude by creating a separate page from the main body of the insurance policy to indicate the level of importance.

Can I Expect Insurance Companies to Pay for CHS Claims?

Depending on the circumstances such as the claim and type of policy, CHS is likely to be covered on most product liability insurance policies.  The reason for our opinion is based on the insuring agreement, definition of bodily injury, and lack of any exclusions in the policies we reviewed. 

 

The post Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome Illness Leaves Industry Wondering about Insurance Protection appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>
https://shoppotinsurance.com/cannabinoid-hyperemesis-syndrome-illness-leaves-industry-wondering-about-insurance-protection/feed/ 0 2772
How Risky is Using a Rice Cooker to Infuse THC? https://shoppotinsurance.com/how-risky-is-using-a-rice-cooker-to-infuse-thc/ https://shoppotinsurance.com/how-risky-is-using-a-rice-cooker-to-infuse-thc/#respond Sat, 09 Mar 2019 16:04:36 +0000 https://shoppotinsurance.com/?p=2600 The post How Risky is Using a Rice Cooker to Infuse THC? appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>

Cannabis Insurance Requirements when using a rice cooker

Cannabis Insurance requirements when using a rice cooker

Buying Cannabis Insurance is like Entering into a Black Hole

This article was prompted by a client who uses a rice cooker to infuse THC.  I began to sweat imagining what list of conditions and requirements would the insurance carrier force upon us just to buy insurance.  Think about it…its a rice cooker using low heat that can be plugged into your basic electrical outlet.  Rice cookers have been around a long time.  Their chances of it blowing up or causing a fire are pretty low and can even be used to make rice.   But, you combine cannabis and rice cooker with insurance it gets complicated.

As the cannabis insurance industry continues to mature, I’m witnessing a perverse need by the insurance industry to load up customers with many mind numbing requirements in order to obtain insurance.  The list can be exhaustive, burdensome, and nauseating for the agent and customer to meet every demand.

Some of it makes sense and some of it doesn’t, but we’re talking conditions, subjectivities, and warranties to use insurance industry jargon.  Basically, these terms mean if you’re untruthful or fail to comply, the insurance carrier will seek a position to deny a claim based on the facts. 

Essentially, you’re stepping into the insurance black hole that could cost you.        

Now, Greenpoint is not adverse to risk management.  We recognize certain requirements are good for the customer in preventing damage when it makes sense and its reasonable.  We are just trying to find the right balance between meeting the needs of the insurance industry and not overwhelming the cannabis client.

Can you say warranties, conditions, and subjectivities three times?

Here’s a small list of requirements or warranties being mandated by some of our insurance providers:

  1. Active Central Station Alarm
  2. Motion room detectors
  3. Electrical warranty confirming the electrical was performed by a licensed electrical contractor and insured.
  4. Electrical warranty confirming in the next 30 days the electrical will be inspected by a licensed electrician. 
  5. No incandescent lighting
  6. Confirm adequate electrical circuits and plugs for intended use
  7. No smoking of anything at the facility
  8. No open loop extractions
  9. Proper storage of chemicals
  10. Proper storage of fertilizers
  11. Updated roof
  12. Updated electrical
  13. Updated plumbing
  14. Updated hvac
  15. No hanging plastic dividers
  16. Subject to confirmation all employees using the extraction equipment are trained
  17. Subject to equipment being regularly maintained
  18. Proper ventilation/gas detection systems are in place
  19. Subject to providing Standard Operating Procedures and Maintenance Program Log
  20. Non-owned automobile coverage is available if drivers are not on a regular schedule
  21. Confirm your cannabis is not being sold to minors
  22. Confirm you cannabis product is not crossing state lines.
  23. Confirm your cannabis is being testing for heavy metals
  24. Confirm your safe meets a particular TL rating
  25. Confirm your vault meets specific build quality and materials.

Open loop extracting is illegal in regulated cannabis markets

Out of the list, the confirmation of not processing cannabis through an open loop extraction system seems bizarre.  To our readers unfamiliar with the term open loop, think of using a solvent such as butane to extract the cannabis oils without proper equipment and ventilation.   Open loop is like making moonshine in the mountains of West Virginia or Kentucky.  Asking a client if they extract using open loop should have been asked 10 years ago prior to regulations.

The title of one YouTube appropriately calls it Back porch BHO blasting. 

This process would be illegal in regulated markets such as Washington and Colorado.  Knowing its illegal, why would the insurance carrier ask the applicant if they are using an open loop system.  Makes no sense.  Time would be better spent on confirming the types of safety incorporated into their closed loop extraction equipment and methods.   

We strongly encourage the cannabis insurance carriers to carefully scrutinize their list.  What makes sense?  What is reasonable?

For cannabis or cbd operations, we strongly encourage you buy insurance from an insurance broker who has knowledge of these types of issues before entering the game of buying of insurance.  

The post How Risky is Using a Rice Cooker to Infuse THC? appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>
https://shoppotinsurance.com/how-risky-is-using-a-rice-cooker-to-infuse-thc/feed/ 0 2600
Cannabis Retailers Want Manufacturers to Cover them from Liability through Insurance https://shoppotinsurance.com/cannabis-retailers-want-manufacturers-to-cover-them-from-liability-through-insurance/ https://shoppotinsurance.com/cannabis-retailers-want-manufacturers-to-cover-them-from-liability-through-insurance/#respond Fri, 15 Feb 2019 01:07:35 +0000 https://shoppotinsurance.com/?p=2538 The post Cannabis Retailers Want Manufacturers to Cover them from Liability through Insurance appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>

 

Cannabis stores may not realize most carriers are saying no coverage for vape pen batteries

The latest insurance trend in the cannabis industry has to do with cannabis stores requiring their manufacturers to include them as additional insureds for product liability.  Additional insured means the store is listed on the policy for liability protection.  Even more interesting for insurance geeks are stores are asking the batteries for vape pens must be covered.  

A typical scenario is the manufacturer of the vape pen and battery sells these products to a variety of retail cannabis stores.  A store requests their business must be covered on the manufacturers insurance policy for product liability.  The evidence comes in the form of a Certificate of Insurance without any real verification the batteries are indeed covered on the manufacturers policy.  

Why are cannabis retailers requesting this type of coverage for batteries?  

 

Cannabis Insurance Company making certain requirements

 

We don’t see any evidence of retailers or manufacturers considering this type of obligation in their relationships or contracts.  It may be the cannabis insurance companies forcing their store clients to request the coverage from the manufacturer as a condition of their insurance.  This is a method we strongly are against for a variety of reasons, if its true.

For example, a cannabis store is buying product liability insurance from an agent.  The agents tells the cannabis store they must be added as additional insured on the manufacturers policy or else they may not be able to buy insurance according to the carrier’s underwriter.  

The other scenario could be some cannabis store became concerned with exploding batteries and decided to request coverage from their manufacturers in case something went wrong. 

The truth is cannabis insurance companies are not covering most batteries

 

No insurance coverage for vape pens

 

Based on current market conditions certain product liability insurance policies are covering the vape pens.  However, they seem to be running away from batteries.

We reviewed several product liability insurance policies to determine if batteries are being covered. 

Here’s what we discovered:

No Coverage of Batteries on Insurance Policies

Cannabis Insurance Carrier ACannabis Insurance Carrier BCannabis Insurance Carrier C
EXCLUSIONS BATTERIES

This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury", "property damage", or "personal and advertising" arising out of batteries. This exclusion applies regardless of whether:

A. Said batteries were manufactured, sold, handled, distributed or disposed of by your or others trading under your name or on your behalf; or
b. "Your work" or
VAPORIZING EQUIPMENT AND COMPONENTS EXCLUSION

In consideration of the premium charged for the policy, it is hereby understood and agreed that coverage under this policy does not apply to any claim arising out of the use, handling or ownership of vaporizing equipment, or any part of the accessories attached or used with the vaporizing equipment including pens, cartridges, mouth pieces, batteries, chargers, coils and any miscellaneous products used with, or attached to, vaporizing equipment.
DESIGNATED PRODUCTS EXCLUSION--PRODUCT RELATED TO ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES, VAPORIZERS AND SIMILAR DEVICES.

Batteries manufactured, distributed or sold by, or disposed of by, or in any way used or handled by, or sold under the label of :

a. ShenZhen Fest Technology, Co., Ltd
b. ShenZhen E-Young Technology Co., Ltd
c. EFEST
d. ShenZhen Mxjo Technology Co., Ltd
e. MXJO
f. MXJO Tech

In our table, Carrier B is excluding batteries and vape pens from coverage.  Carrier C has a list of batteries they believe are the most dangerous.  

If you’re a store requesting this coverage from your infused product manufacturer it would be prudent to be certain its even offered.  More importantly, cannabis retailers through their agents may want to question the insurance company if this is indeed a requirement of buying and maintaining insurance.   

The post Cannabis Retailers Want Manufacturers to Cover them from Liability through Insurance appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>
https://shoppotinsurance.com/cannabis-retailers-want-manufacturers-to-cover-them-from-liability-through-insurance/feed/ 0 2538
Number of Insurance Carriers Decrease by Product Type https://shoppotinsurance.com/number-of-insurance-carriers-decrease-by-product-type/ https://shoppotinsurance.com/number-of-insurance-carriers-decrease-by-product-type/#respond Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:46:16 +0000 https://shoppotinsurance.com/?p=2460 The post Number of Insurance Carriers Decrease by Product Type appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>

Cannabis Insurance Carrier Graph by Product Type

Limited Number of Cannabis Insurance Companies

If you’re wondering if there’s a lot of insurance companies serving the cannabis industry this graph may help give you a different perspective. 

The number of insurance carriers providing the primary coverages such as general liability and business property are more readily available throughout the United States.  The reason is the risks appear more predictable to the insurance industry.  As you move on the graph from left to right, the number of carriers offering a particular type of cannabis insurance will decrease dramatically. 

Less options means inability to comparison shop your insurance

Cannabis Insurance Proposal Banner

For example, the Directors & Officers, Commercial Auto, and Workers Compensation may be 2 or 3 companies serving each product segment.  The less number of carriers offering coverage is indicator the risks are not as predictable.  The limited supply of insurance companies doesn’t mean the pricing will be inflated.  It will mean the insurance buyer will not have the ability to comparison shop.  

If you’re a cannabis or hemp/cbd licensee it will be important as your shop for insurance to keep this in mind as you’re contemplating your insurance needs.

 

The post Number of Insurance Carriers Decrease by Product Type appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>
https://shoppotinsurance.com/number-of-insurance-carriers-decrease-by-product-type/feed/ 0 2460
Are Insurance Carriers Violating the Constitutional Rights of the Cannabis Industry? https://shoppotinsurance.com/are-insurance-carriers-violating-the-constitutional-rights-of-the-cannabis-industry/ https://shoppotinsurance.com/are-insurance-carriers-violating-the-constitutional-rights-of-the-cannabis-industry/#respond Thu, 24 Jan 2019 22:36:58 +0000 https://shoppotinsurance.com/?p=2440 The post Are Insurance Carriers Violating the Constitutional Rights of the Cannabis Industry? appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>

Cannabis Insurance Application

Questionable Questions Asked by Insurance Carriers

Applying for business Insurance through the use of applications produced by the insurance company is a normal business practice regardless of the industry.  What isn’t normal and seemingly unique with the insurance industry are questions to cannabis applicants if they are operating illegally and conducting criminal activity.  

Below are the exact questions currently used by a major insurance carrier we’ll keep anonymous at this time. 

  • Do you distribute your cannabis product to minors? 

Answering yes would potentially mean the applicant is violating state and federal law for selling cannabis to a minor.  One exception could be if the applicant is a medical marijuana licensee whose patient has a prescription from an MD who happens to be a minor. 

  • Do you transport or distribute your product across state lines? 

Answering would be an admission the applicant is distributing cannabis across state lines would be a violation of state and federal law.  

  • Do you either grow marijuana on public lands or purchase any marijuana grown on public lands? 

Once again, a potential violation of federal and state law by answering in the affirmative and self incrimination. 

These questions became part of a supplemental application for business property.  This is insurance coverage for buildings, equipment, tenant improvements, and loss of income.  As if the insurance process isn’t lengthy enough, the supplemental application is four pages totaling 31 questions with a sub-set of approximately 40 more questions.           

Apparently, the insurance industry has forgotten certain provisions within the US Constitution affording citizens of rights.  More specifically, the Fifth and Sixth Amendment protects the rights of individuals from self incrimination and allows due process to be performed before an individual is denied their freedom.  

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Source:  Cornell Law School

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Source:  Cornell Law School

Most people have heard to plead the fifth or being given their Miranda rights.  The sixth amendment gives everyone the opportunity have their day in court. 

What about other industries?  Are similar questions being asked in the Pharmaceutical and Liquor Industry?

NoNot even remotely close. 

We reviewed other insurance applications used for the Pharmaceutical Industry offered through CNA Insurance and Kinsale Insurance Company to determine the scope of their questions.   Neither of these two applications asked questions that would place a person(s) in legal jeopardy.

How about the liquor industry? 

Those Insurance applications don’t question an applicants ongoing criminal violations either.   One application asked if the insured had been convicted of a felony.  A conviction of a felony is different from conducting a felony.   

Properly Underwrite Risk without Violating the Rights of Others   

Cannabis Insurance Police

Photo by Vincent Chan on Unsplash

Most insurance brokers and underwriters will  not object to the proper underwriting and evaluation of risk by the insurance industry before coverage is offered and purchased.  This would include being in compliance with all laws. 

However, it would not be appropriate and possibly illegal for insurance companies to continue with this line of questioning as a business practice.  If the applicant indicates yes to providing cannabis to minors would the insurance company deny the application and notify law enforcement? 

Insurance companies are not members of the law enforcement community and should leave it to the professionals.     

Insurance Application Questions

 

The post Are Insurance Carriers Violating the Constitutional Rights of the Cannabis Industry? appeared first on Marijuana Insurance | Cannabis Insurance.

]]>
https://shoppotinsurance.com/are-insurance-carriers-violating-the-constitutional-rights-of-the-cannabis-industry/feed/ 0 2440